The Supreme Court of India on July 7, 2026 agreed to urgently list an appeal filed by dressage riders Anush Agarwalla and Sudipti Hajela, challenging the Equestrian Federation of India’s team selection for the Asian Games 2026 in Aichi-Nagoya, Japan.
A bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah scheduled the matter for hearing on July 9, 2026 (Thursday) after senior counsel sought an urgent hearing, according to Bar & Bench. Justice Amanullah remarked “It’s my favorite sport” before agreeing to list the petition, as reported by LawBeat.
Background & Case History
The dispute arose after the EFI Ad-hoc Committee issued its dressage team selection list for the 2026 Asian Games on June 16, 2026. Agarwalla and Hajela — both members of India’s gold medal-winning dressage contingent at the 2022 Asian Games — were named as first and second reserve riders respectively, rather than as principal team members.
The Supreme Court petition is titled Anush Agarwalla v. Ad-Hoc Committee for Governance of Equestrian Federation of India, Diary No. 39652/2026, per LiveLaw. The matter has traversed both single-judge and division bench stages at the Delhi High Court before reaching the apex court.
The proceedings at the Delhi HC began when Agarwalla and Hajela filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the selection. A single judge, Justice Mini Pushkarna, dismissed those petitions on June 29, 2026, holding the EFI selection process to be fair and in consonance with the selection criteria, per SCC Online.
- June 16, 2026: EFI Ad-hoc Committee issues selection list; Agarwalla and Hajela named as reserve riders.
- June 29, 2026: Justice Mini Pushkarna of the Delhi HC dismisses the riders’ writ petitions, upholds EFI’s process.
- July 2, 2026: Delhi HC Division Bench summons personal presence of the IOA CEO after EFI refused the Union government’s proposal for independent expert evaluation of rider rankings, per LawBeat.
- July 3, 2026: Delhi HC Division Bench reserves judgment on the appeals.
- July 6, 2026: Delhi HC Division Bench (Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia) delivers judgment — finds EFI breached its own criteria but declines to interfere.
- July 7, 2026: Appeal filed before the Supreme Court; the bench agrees to urgent listing.
Arguments & Submissions
Before the Delhi HC Division Bench, the appellants contended that the EFI had failed to comply with Clauses 15(a) and 15(b) of its own Selection Criteria Version 4.0. The dispute also encompassed the methodology used for calculating Minimum Eligibility Requirements (MERs) and allegations of bias against a member of the selection committee, as reported by The Print.
Adding a charged dimension to the proceedings, leaked private messages involving Yashodhara Raje Scindia, chair of the EFI Ad-hoc Committee, were produced before the Division Bench during hearings, according to The Print.
The EFI’s refusal to accept the Union government’s proposal for an independent expert evaluation of rider rankings proved particularly contentious. It prompted the Delhi HC Division Bench on July 2, 2026 to seek the personal presence of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) CEO, per LawBeat.
The Ruling: Key Findings
The Delhi HC Division Bench delivered a notable but ultimately restrained judgment on July 6, 2026. It found procedural non-compliance by the EFI while simultaneously declining to grant the relief sought, according to Bar & Bench.
The Division Bench held: “while we do not find any infirmity in the preparation of the list of Probables in terms of Clause 13 of the Selection Criteria, we are of the view that the requirements prescribed under Clauses 15(a) and 15(b) of the Selection Criteria were not duly complied with.”
Despite this finding of non-compliance, the bench refused to order a fresh selection process. It cited the imminent July 15, 2026 deadline for submission of the final Asian Games entry list, reasoning that ordering fresh trials at this stage would be logistically impractical, per LiveLaw and LawBeat.
The bench justified its restraint in the following terms: “Such restraint is warranted in the larger interest of the sport and to avoid any adverse impact on the prospects of the Indian Team participating in the Dressage Event at the Asian Games.” The final operative direction read: “The present Appeals are disposed of without interference with the Impugned Judgment, with direction to EFI to strictly comply with the Selection Criteria henceforth.”
Legal Analysis & Implications
The original writ petitions were founded on Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which empowers High Courts to issue directions, orders, or writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights and for other purposes.
The Division Bench’s ruling creates a legally uncomfortable precedent: a superior court found that a sports federation had breached its own binding selection criteria, yet declined to remedy that breach on grounds of deadline pressure. This tension between procedural compliance and logistical expediency now squarely falls before the Supreme Court for resolution.
The July 15, 2026 entry submission deadline — nine days after the HC judgment — creates acute time pressure. The Supreme Court’s agreement to list the matter on July 9 signals judicial recognition of the urgency. Any interim relief ordered on that date could still practically alter the composition of India’s team before the deadline passes.
The case also raises broader questions about accountability in sports federation governance, particularly the weight courts should assign to a federation’s own criteria violations when administrative convenience militates against correction.
Reactions & Stakeholder Response
The EFI’s repeated resistance to external oversight — including its outright refusal of the Union government’s proposal for independent evaluation — has drawn significant judicial attention at both the High Court and Supreme Court levels, as reported by LawBeat and Bar & Bench.
The Delhi HC Division Bench, while refusing to set aside the selection, took the notable step of directing EFI to strictly comply with its Selection Criteria in all future selections — an implicit acknowledgment that the federation’s internal governance requires judicial supervision.
What’s Next
The Supreme Court bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah is scheduled to hear the matter on July 9, 2026. The critical threshold question before the court will be whether to grant interim relief that could alter the team composition before the July 15, 2026 final entry submission deadline for the Asian Games.
The 2026 Asian Games are scheduled to be held in Aichi-Nagoya, Japan, from September 19 to October 4, 2026. With team entry closing on July 15, the Supreme Court has a narrow window to meaningfully intervene.
More legal news at The Courtroom.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change or vary by case — consult a qualified lawyer before acting. The Courtroom is not liable for any reliance on this content.
