Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

15 Best Top Advocates in India You Must Know in 2026

India's Top Advocates in 2026: Who Leads the Bar and Why It MattersThe top advocates in India are not simply the most famous courtroom...
HomeNewsHigh CourtKarur Stampede: Madras HC Permits TVK Govt To Issue Compassionate Appointment Letters,...

Karur Stampede: Madras HC Permits TVK Govt To Issue Compassionate Appointment Letters, Keeps Jobs Subject To Judicial Review

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on July 10, 2026, permitted the Tamil Nadu TVK-led government to proceed with a function at which Chief Minister Vijay was to hand over government job appointment letters to families of the 41 victims of the Karur stampede.

According to LiveLaw, the Division Bench directed that all appointments would remain temporary and subject to further judicial review, and that no beneficiary should receive their first salary before the matter is heard again.

Background: How We Got Here

The Karur stampede occurred on September 27, 2025, at Velusamypuram, Karur District, Tamil Nadu, during a political rally organised by the TVK party led by actor-politician Vijay. The tragedy resulted in 41 deaths and injuries to over 100 people.

The incident is under CBI investigation, monitored by a supervisory committee appointed by the Supreme Court. After TVK won the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections in April 2026, CM Vijay’s government decided to offer compassionate government employment to families of all 41 deceased victims.

  • A Madurai-based lawyer, Theeran Thirumurugan, filed a petition challenging the appointments — cited in LiveLaw as Theeran Thirumurugan @ Thirumurugan v The Chief Secretary [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 308].
  • The petitioner argued the move violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, which guarantee equality before law and equal opportunity in public employment, as per NewsDrum.
  • The petitioner further contended that granting irreversible administrative benefits while Karur stampede proceedings were pending before the Supreme Court would cause legal and administrative complications, according to LiveLaw.

The Ruling — Key Findings

The Division Bench of Justice CV Karthikeyan and Justice R Sakthivel of the Madurai Bench heard the petition on July 10, 2026, and declined to stall the government’s function scheduled for 3 PM that afternoon, as reported by Bar & Bench.

The Bench observed: “It would be extremely narrow for the court to interfere with a policy decision of the government.” It added: “But we would permit the function to proceed further with a condition that the employment would only be on a temporary basis, subject to further review.”

The court issued several significant directions alongside its order. It suo motu impleaded the Member Secretary of the Public Service Commission, directing him to file a report on compassionate appointment guidelines and whether they were followed in this case, according to LiveLaw and Bar & Bench.

The Bench also impleaded the Member Secretary of the Supreme Court-appointed supervisory committee overseeing the CBI investigation into the Karur stampede as a respondent, as reported by Bar & Bench.

On the question of precedent, the state counsel cited the case of Thoothukudi police firing victims, whose families had previously been granted government jobs. The court drew a clear distinction — noting that the Thoothukudi incident involved police excess by the State itself, whereas the Karur stampede did not carry that character, according to LiveLaw.

The court made clear that beneficiaries must not receive their first salary before the case returns for hearing, and indicated it intends to take up the matter again before the end of July 2026, as reported by Bar & Bench and NewsDrum.

Reactions & What’s Next

The state counsel informed the court that an intervention application filed before the Supreme Court challenging the proposed appointments had been withdrawn, according to LiveLaw and NewsDrum.

The government function to distribute appointment letters to families of the 41 Karur stampede victims proceeded as planned at 3 PM on July 10, 2026, with CM Vijay presiding, according to Bar & Bench.

The matter is now scheduled to be heard again before the end of July 2026. The Public Service Commission’s Member Secretary must submit a report on whether compassionate appointment guidelines were followed. The outcome of that hearing will determine whether the appointments become permanent or are set aside.

More legal news at The Courtroom.

What did the Madras High Court order regarding the Karur stampede compassionate appointments?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court permitted the TVK government to issue government job appointment letters to families of the 41 Karur stampede victims on July 10, 2026. However, all appointments were directed to be temporary and subject to further judicial review. Beneficiaries were also barred from receiving their first salary before the next hearing, according to LiveLaw and Bar & Bench.

Who filed the petition challenging the Karur stampede job appointments?

The petition was filed by Theeran Thirumurugan, a Madurai-based lawyer. The case is cited as Theeran Thirumurugan @ Thirumurugan v The Chief Secretary [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 308]. He argued the appointments violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, per NewsDrum.

When did the Karur stampede occur and how many people were killed?

The Karur stampede occurred on September 27, 2025, at Velusamypuram, Karur District, Tamil Nadu, during a TVK political rally led by actor-politician Vijay. It resulted in 41 deaths and injuries to over 100 people. The CBI is currently investigating the incident under supervision of a Supreme Court-appointed committee.

Which judges heard the Karur stampede compassionate appointment petition?

The petition was heard by a Division Bench comprising Justice CV Karthikeyan and Justice R Sakthivel of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, according to LiveLaw and Bar & Bench.

Disclaimer

Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change or vary by case — consult a qualified lawyer before acting. The Courtroom is not liable for any reliance on this content.