Become a member

Get the best offers and updates relating to Liberty Case News.

― Advertisement ―

spot_img

8 Untold Hindu Succession Daughters Property Rights

District Courts Are Rewriting Hindu Succession Daughters Property Rights Before 2024 Even Ended Most people assume landmark change flows downward from the Supreme Court. In...
HomeLaw FirmsDeal MeterCAM Advises Accel on FirstClub Series B

CAM Advises Accel on FirstClub Series B

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) has advised Accel on its follow-on investment in Firstclub Technologies Private Limited, as part of FirstClub’s Series B fundraise co-led by PeakXV Partners and Sofina. The round raised $55 million, valuing the Bengaluru-based startup at $255 million post-money. This mandate adds to CAM’s growing track record in venture and growth-stage financing in India’s competitive quick commerce sector.

Introduction

Firstclub Technologies Private Limited engages in the business of wholesale trading, including the sale of goods and merchandise through both online and offline channels. The Series B fundraise was co-led by PeakXV Partners and Sofina, with existing institutional investors Accel, RTP Global, and Paramark Ventures participating in the round. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas was specifically engaged to advise Accel on its follow-on participation in this fundraise, acting for one of FirstClub’s earliest and most consistent backers.

Deal Value

FirstClub’s Series B raised $55 million (approximately ₹512 crore). The transaction values the company at $255 million on a post-money basis — more than double its valuation of $120 million at the time of its preceding fundraise approximately nine months earlier. With this round, FirstClub’s total funding raised to date stands at $86 million.

Legal Teams Involved

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) acted as legal counsel to Accel in connection with Accel’s follow-on investment in Firstclub Technologies Private Limited.

The CAM transaction team comprised:

  • KZ Kuriyan, Partner (team lead)
  • Siddarth Chokkalingam, Principal Associate
  • Anish Meduri, Associate

Further details of any other legal counsel advising the other investors or the company on this specific mandate were not disclosed in the raw content provided. For a broader view of law firm activity on this deal, see the Deal Meter.

Significance and Impact

Accel has been a cornerstone investor in FirstClub since the company’s earliest stages, having led the $8 million seed round and participated in the Series A. Its follow-on commitment in the Series B — and the consequent engagement of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas to provide dedicated legal counsel — underscores the depth of Accel’s conviction in the company’s quality-first wholesale and commerce model. The structure of Accel’s continued participation as a follow-on investor, rather than a new institutional entrant, reflects a pattern of sustained venture backing that is increasingly relevant in India’s maturing startup ecosystem.

From a legal standpoint, the mandate demonstrates CAM‘s continued strength in advising global and domestic venture capital funds on growth-stage investments in the Indian technology and commerce space. The transaction also highlights the practical importance of dedicated investor-side legal counsel even where an investor is a follow-on participant — a structural feature of increasingly professionalised venture deal processes in India.

Conclusion

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has successfully advised Accel on its follow-on investment in Firstclub Technologies Private Limited as part of the company’s $55 million Series B fundraise co-led by PeakXV Partners and Sofina. The deal, which values FirstClub at $255 million post-money, marks a significant milestone in the company’s growth trajectory and reinforces Accel’s long-standing commitment to the platform. The CAM team, led by KZ Kuriyan (Partner), with Siddarth Chokkalingam (Principal Associate) and Anish Meduri (Associate), steered the legal advisory on the investor side.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is based on the details provided and publicly available sources.