Thursday, July 18, 2024
HomeNewsLegalPresident Droupadi Murmu Rejects Mercy Plea of 2000 Red Fort Attack Case...

President Droupadi Murmu Rejects Mercy Plea of 2000 Red Fort Attack Case Convict Mohammed Arif

President Droupadi Murmu has declined the mercy petition of Pakistani terrorist Mohammed Arif convicted in the nearly 24-year-old Red Fort attack case, officials confirmed on June 12.

This marks the second time President Droupadi Murmu has rejected a mercy plea since assuming office on July 25, 2022, showcasing a consistent stance on cases involving grave offenses.

Background of the Case

Mohammed Arif, a member of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and a Pakistani national, was apprehended by the Delhi Police four days after the attack on December 22, 2000. The assault, which targeted the 7 Rajputana Rifles unit within the Red Fort premises, resulted in the tragic deaths of three Army personnel.

Legal Proceedings

Following a trial, Mohammed Arif was found guilty of conspiring with other militants to carry out the attack. Despite multiple legal challenges, including review and curative petitions, his plea for mercy was ultimately dismissed, highlighting the severity of the crime and its implications for national security.

Supreme Court’s Verdict

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, affirmed the death penalty awarded to Arif, emphasizing the absence of mitigating circumstances in his favor and the direct threat posed to the country’s unity, integrity, and sovereignty by the attack on the Red Fort.

Previous Legal Challenges

Arif’s journey through the legal system included appeals to both the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court, all of which upheld the initial decision of sentencing him to death. Despite various petitions and appeals, including requests for a review and curative petitions, the severity of the crime led to the rejection of mercy pleas.

Consistent Judicial Response

The rejection of Arif’s mercy plea underscores the unwavering commitment of the Indian judicial system and executive authorities to uphold justice, particularly in cases of terrorism and threats to national security.

Continued Vigilance

As India remains steadfast in its efforts to combat terrorism and safeguard its citizens, such decisive actions serve as a testament to the nation’s resolve in addressing threats to its sovereignty and unity.

Share your news, articles, deals, columns, or press releases with us! Click the link to submit and join our platform today.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments